Paper detail

On large deviations of additive functions

We prove that if two additive functions (from a certain class) take large values with roughly the same probability then they must be identical. The Kac-Kubilius model suggests that the distribution of values of a given additive function can be modeled by a sum of random variables. We show that the model is accurate (in a large deviation sense) when one is looking at values of the additive function around its mean, but fails, by a constant multiple, for large values of the additive function. We believe that this phenomenon arises, because the model breaks down for the values of the additive function on the "large" primes. In the second part of the paper, we are motivated by a question of Elliott, to understand how much the distribution of values of the additive function on primes determines, and is determined by, the distribution of values of the additive function on all of the integers. For example, our main theorem, implies that a positive, strongly additive function is roughly Poisson distributed on the integers if and only if it is $1+o(1)$ or $o(1)$ on almost all primes.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.

On large deviations of additive functions | BZPEER | BZPEER