Paper detail

On improvements of the $r$-adding walk in a finite field of characteristic 2

It is currently known from the work of Shoup and Nechaev that a generic algorithm to solve the discrete logarithm problem in a group of prime order must have complexity at least $k\sqrt{N}$ where $N$ is the order of the group. In many collision search algorithms this complexity is achieved. So with generic algorithms one can only hope to make the $k$ smaller. This $k$ depends on the complexity of the iterative step in the generic algorithms. The $\sqrt{N}$ comes from the fact there is about $\sqrt{N}$ iterations before a collision. So if we can find ways that can reduce the amount of work in one iteration then that is of great interest and probably the only possible modification of a generic algorithm. The modified $r$-adding walk allegedly does just that. It claims to reduce the amount of work done in one iteration of the original $r$-adding walk. In this paper we study this modified $r$-adding walk, we critically analyze it and we compare it with the original $r$-adding walk.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.