Paper detail

On Hypothesis Testing Against Independence with Multiple Decision Centers

A distributed binary hypothesis testing problem is studied with one observer and two decision centers. Achievable type-II error exponents are derived for testing against conditional independence when the observer communicates with the two decision centers over one common and two individual noise-free bit pipes and when it communicates with them over a noisy broadcast channel (BC). The results are based on a coding and testing scheme that splits the observations into subblocks, so that transmitter and receivers can independently apply to each subblock either Gray-Wyner coordination coding with side-information or hybrid joint source-channel coding with side-information, followed by a Neyman-Pearson test over the subblocks at the receivers. This approach allows to avoid introducing further error exponents that one would expect from the receivers' decoding operations related to binning or the noisy transmission channel. The derived exponents are shown to be optimal in some special cases when communication is over noise-free links. The results reveal a tradeoff between the type-II error exponents at the two decision centers.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.