Paper detail

On hitting time, mixing time and geometric interpretations of Metropolis-Hastings reversiblizations

Given a target distribution $μ$ and a proposal chain with generator $Q$ on a finite state space, in this paper we study two types of Metropolis-Hastings (MH) generator $M_1(Q,μ)$ and $M_2(Q,μ)$ in a continuous-time setting. While $M_1$ is the classical MH generator, we define a new generator $M_2$ that captures the opposite movement of $M_1$ and provide a comprehensive suite of comparison results ranging from hitting time and mixing time to asymptotic variance, large deviations and capacity, which demonstrate that $M_2$ enjoys superior mixing properties than $M_1$. To see that $M_1$ and $M_2$ are natural transformations, we offer an interesting geometric interpretation of $M_1$, $M_2$ and their convex combinations as $\ell^1$ minimizers between $Q$ and the set of $μ$-reversible generators, extending the results by Billera and Diaconis (2001). We provide two examples as illustrations. In the first one we give explicit spectral analysis of $M_1$ and $M_2$ for Metropolised independent sampling, while in the second example we prove a Laplace transform order of the fastest strong stationary time between birth-death $M_1$ and $M_2$.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.