Paper detail

On High-Contrast Characterization of Nearby, Short-Period Exoplanets with Giant Segmented-Mirror Telescopes

Measurements of the frequency with which short-period planets occur around main sequence stars allows a direct prediction of the number and types of such planets that will be amenable to characterization by high-contrast instruments on future giant segmented- mirror telescopes (GSMTs). Adopting conservative assumptions, I predict of order 10 planets with radii R_P=1-8 R_Earth and equilibrium temperatures <400 K should be accessible around stars within 8 pc of the Sun. These numbers are roughly the same for both near-infrared observations of scattered starlight and mid-infrared observations of planetary thermal emission, with the latter observations demonstrating greater relative sensitivity to smaller and cooler planets. Adopting the conservative assumption that planets with R_P=1-2 R_E and 2-4 R_E occur with equal frequency, I predict a 40% chance that a planet with R_P=1-2 R_E and equilibrium temperature 200-250 K will accessible to high-contrast thermal infrared characterization; this would be a compelling object for further study. To validate these predictions, more detailed analyses are needed of the occurrence frequencies of low-mass planets around M dwarfs, both in the Kepler field and in the solar neighborhood. Several planets already discovered by radial velocity surveys will be accessible to near-infrared high-contrast GSMT observations, including the low-mass planets alpha Cen Bb and (depending on their albedos) GJ 139c and d, GJ 876b and c, and tau Cet b, c, and d; tau Cet f would be amenable to thermal infrared characterization. Further efforts to model the near-infrared reflectance and mid-infrared emission of these and other short-period planets are clearly warranted, and will pave the way for the interpretation of future high-contrast characterization of a variety of planets around the nearest stars.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.