Paper detail

On Hardness of Jumbled Indexing

Jumbled indexing is the problem of indexing a text $T$ for queries that ask whether there is a substring of $T$ matching a pattern represented as a Parikh vector, i.e., the vector of frequency counts for each character. Jumbled indexing has garnered a lot of interest in the last four years. There is a naive algorithm that preprocesses all answers in $O(n^2|Σ|)$ time allowing quick queries afterwards, and there is another naive algorithm that requires no preprocessing but has $O(n\log|Σ|)$ query time. Despite a tremendous amount of effort there has been little improvement over these running times. In this paper we provide good reason for this. We show that, under a 3SUM-hardness assumption, jumbled indexing for alphabets of size $ω(1)$ requires $Ω(n^{2-ε})$ preprocessing time or $Ω(n^{1-δ})$ query time for any $ε,δ>0$. In fact, under a stronger 3SUM-hardness assumption, for any constant alphabet size $r\ge 3$ there exist describable fixed constant $ε_r$ and $δ_r$ such that jumbled indexing requires $Ω(n^{2-ε_r})$ preprocessing time or $Ω(n^{1-δ_r})$ query time.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.