Paper detail

On Gromov's Method of Selecting Heavily Covered Points

A result of Boros and Füredi ($d=2$) and of Bárány (arbitrary $d$) asserts that for every $d$ there exists $c_d>0$ such that for every $n$-point set $P\subset \R^d$, some point of $\R^d$ is covered by at least $c_d{n\choose d+1}$ of the $d$-simplices spanned by the points of $P$. The largest possible value of $c_d$ has been the subject of ongoing research. Recently Gromov improved the existing lower bounds considerably by introducing a new, topological proof method. We provide an exposition of the combinatorial component of Gromov's approach, in terms accessible to combinatorialists and discrete geometers, and we investigate the limits of his method. In particular, we give tighter bounds on the \emph{cofilling profiles} for the $(n-1)$-simplex. These bounds yield a minor improvement over Gromov's lower bounds on $c_d$ for large $d$, but they also show that the room for further improvement through the {\cofilling} profiles alone is quite small. We also prove a slightly better lower bound for $c_3$ by an approach using an additional structure besides the {\cofilling} profiles. We formulate a combinatorial extremal problem whose solution might perhaps lead to a tight lower bound for $c_d$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.