Abstract
A graph is word-representable if there exists a word over the alphabet such that letters and alternate in if and only if is an edge in . A graph is word-representable if and only if it is -word-representable for some , that is, if there exists a word containing copies of each letter that represents the graph. Also, being -word-representable implies being -word-representable. The minimum such that a word-representable graph is -word-representable, is called graph's representation number. Graphs with representation number 1 are complete graphs, while graphs with representation number 2 are circle graphs. The only fact known before this paper on the class of graphs with representation number 3, denoted by , is that the Petersen graph and triangular prism belong to this class. In this paper, we show that any prism belongs to , and that two particular operations of extending graphs preserve the property of being in . Further, we show that is not included in a class of -colorable graphs for a constant . To this end, we extend three known results related to operations on graphs. We also show that ladder graphs used in the study of prisms are -word-representable, and thus each ladder graph is a circle graph. Finally, we discuss -word-representing comparability graphs via consideration of crown graphs, where we state some problems for further research.
Connections
Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Reviews 0
Write a review
No reviews yet.
Discussion 0
Add a comment
No comments yet.