Paper detail

On GitHub's Programming Languages

GitHub is the most widely used social, distributed version control system. It has around 10 million registered users and hosts over 16 million public repositories. Its user base is also very active as GitHub ranks in the top 100 Alexa most popular websites. In this study, we collect GitHub's state in its entirety. Doing so, allows us to study new aspects of the ecosystem. Although GitHub is the home to millions of users and repositories, the analysis of users' activity time-series reveals that only around 10% of them can be considered active. The collected dataset allows us to investigate the popularity of programming languages and existence of pattens in the relations between users, repositories, and programming languages. By, applying a k-means clustering method to the users-repositories commits matrix, we find that two clear clusters of programming languages separate from the remaining. One cluster forms for "web programming" languages (Java Script, Ruby, PHP, CSS), and a second for "system oriented programming" languages (C, C++, Python). Further classification, allow us to build a phylogenetic tree of the use of programming languages in GitHub. Additionally, we study the main and the auxiliary programming languages of the top 1000 repositories in more detail. We provide a ranking of these auxiliary programming languages using various metrics, such as percentage of lines of code, and PageRank.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.