Paper detail

On generic erasure correcting sets and related problems

Motivated by iterative decoding techniques for the binary erasure channel Hollmann and Tolhuizen introduced and studied the notion of generic erasure correcting sets for linear codes. A generic $(r,s)$--erasure correcting set generates for all codes of codimension $r$ a parity check matrix that allows iterative decoding of all correctable erasure patterns of size $s$ or less. The problem is to derive bounds on the minimum size $F(r,s)$ of generic erasure correcting sets and to find constructions for such sets. In this paper we continue the study of these sets. We derive better lower and upper bounds. Hollmann and Tolhuizen also introduced the stronger notion of $(r,s)$--sets and derived bounds for their minimum size $G(r,s)$. Here also we improve these bounds. We observe that these two conceps are closely related to so called $s$--wise intersecting codes, an area, in which $G(r,s)$ has been studied primarily with respect to ratewise performance. We derive connections. Finally, we observed that hypergraph covering can be used for both problems to derive good upper bounds.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.