Paper detail

On generally covariant mathematical formulation of Feynman integral in Lorentz signature

It is widely accepted that the Feynman integral is one of the most promising methodologies for defining a generally covariant formulation of nonperturbative interacting quantum field theories (QFTs) without a fixed prearranged causal background. Recent literature suggests that if the spacetime metric is not fixed, e.g. because it is to be quantized along with the other fields, one may not be able to avoid considering the Feynman integral in the original Lorentz signature, without Wick rotation. Several mathematical phenomena are known, however, which are at some point showstoppers to a mathematically sound definition of Feynman integral in Lorentz signature. The Feynman integral formulation, however, is known to have a differential reformulation, called to be the master Dyson--Schwinger (MDS) equation for the field correlators. In this paper it is shown that a particular presentation of the MDS equation can be cast into a mathematically rigorously defined form: the involved function spaces and operators can be strictly defined and their properties can be established. Therefore, MDS equation can serve as a substitute for the Feynman integral, in a mathematically sound formulation of constructive QFT, in arbitrary signature, without a fixed background causal structure. It is also shown that even in such a generally covariant setting, there is a canonical way to define the Wilsonian regularization of the MDS equation. The main result of the paper is a necessary and sufficient condition for the regularized MDS solution space to be nonempty, for conformally invariant Lagrangians. This theorem also provides an iterative approximation algorithm for obtaining regularized MDS solutions, and is guaranteed to be convergent whenever the solution space is nonempty. The algorithm could eventually serve as a method for putting Lorentz signature QFTs onto lattice, in the original metric signature.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.