Paper detail

On GCD(Φ_N(a^n),Φ_N(b^n))

There has been interest during the last decade in properties of the sequence {gcd(a^n-1,b^n-1)}, n=1,2,3,..., where a,b are fixed (multiplicatively independent) elements in either the rational integers, the polynomials in one variable over the complex numbers, or the polynomials in one variable over a finite field. In the case of the rational integers, Bugeaud, Corvaja and Zannier have obtained an upper bound exp(εn) for any given ε>0 and all large n, and demonstrate its approximate sharpness by extracting from a paper of Adleman, Pomerance, and Rumely a lower bound \exp(\exp(c\frac{log n}{loglog n})) for infinitely many n, where c is an absolute constant. The upper bound generalizes immediately to gcd(Φ_N(a^n), Φ_N(b^n)) for any positive integer N, where Φ_N(x)$ is the Nth cyclotomic polynomial, the preceding being the case N=1. The lower bound has been generalized in the first author's Ph.D. thesis to N=2. In this paper we generalize the lower bound for arbitrary N but under GRH (the generalized Riemann Hypothesis). The analogue of the lower bound result for gcd(a^n-1,b^n-1) over F_q[T] was proved by Silverman; we prove a corresponding generalization (without GRH).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.