Paper detail

On free-stream preservation in stationary grids for arbitrary linear upwind schemes

In order to improve the application maturity of high-order difference schemes, the free-stream preservation property, whose importance has been widely recognized in recent years, has been developed into a focus of study.. In past literatures, only central schemes are considered to be suitable for free-stream preservation. In this study, the methodology for arbitrary linear schemes to achieve the property is investigated. First, derivations of grid metric by Thomas, Lombard and Neier are reviewed, through which linear schemes for the metric and unsplit flux could attain the property by the proof of Vinokur and Yee firstly. In practical applications, flux splittings are usually at presence and therefore the direct use of upwind schemes seems difficult to fulfill free-stream preservation. To overcome the difficulty, two attempts are made: firstly, a central-scheme-decomposition is worked out, through which a central difference scheme is derived to approximate the first-order partial derivative in metric evaluations; secondly, treatments are proposed for flux splitting and a concrete example is presented. Through these two attempts, the linear upwind node schemes can achieve the property. For half-node or mixed type schemes, interpolations should be used to derive variables at half nodes. As a result, a directionally consistent interpolation is proposed, which is shown to be necessary in order to avoid violation of the metric identity and free-stream preservation. Two numerical problems are also tested, i.e., the free-stream and vortex preservation on wavy, largely randomized and triangular grids. Numerical results validate aforementioned theoretical outcomes; especially, simulations on the triangular grids indicate the methods discussed in this study, which are typical algorithms on structured grids, has the application potential for problems on unstructured meshes.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.