Paper detail

On Flattenability of Graphs

We consider a generalization of the concept of $d$-flattenability of graphs - introduced for the $l_2$ norm by Belk and Connelly - to general $l_p$ norms, with integer $P$, $1 \le p < \infty$, though many of our results work for $l_\infty$ as well. The following results are shown for graphs $G$, using notions of genericity, rigidity, and generic $d$-dimensional rigidity matroid introduced by Kitson for frameworks in general $l_p$ norms, as well as the cones of vectors of pairwise $l_p^p$ distances of a finite point configuration in $d$-dimensional, $l_p$ space: (i) $d$-flattenability of a graph $G$ is equivalent to the convexity of $d$-dimensional, inherent Cayley configurations spaces for $G$, a concept introduced by the first author; (ii) $d$-flattenability and convexity of Cayley configuration spaces over specified non-edges of a $d$-dimensional framework are not generic properties of frameworks (in arbitrary dimension); (iii) $d$-flattenability of $G$ is equivalent to all of $G$'s generic frameworks being $d$-flattenable; (iv) existence of one generic $d$-flattenable framework for $G$ is equivalent to the independence of the edges of $G$, a generic property of frameworks; (v) the rank of $G$ equals the dimension of the projection of the $d$-dimensional stratum of the $l_p^p$ distance cone. We give stronger results for specific norms for $d = 2$: we show that (vi) 2-flattenable graphs for the $l_1$-norm (and $l_\infty$-norm) are a larger class than 2-flattenable graphs for Euclidean $l_2$-norm case and finally (vii) prove further results towards characterizing 2-flattenability in the $l_1$-norm. A number of conjectures and open problems are posed.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.