Paper detail

On feedback in Gaussian multi-hop networks

The study of feedback has been mostly limited to single-hop communication settings. In this paper, we consider Gaussian networks where sources and destinations can communicate with the help of intermediate relays over multiple hops. We assume that links in the network can be bidirected providing opportunities for feedback. We ask the following question: can the information transfer in both directions of a link be critical to maximizing the end-to-end communication rates in the network? Equivalently, could one of the directions in each bidirected link (and more generally at least one of the links forming a cycle) be shut down and the capacity of the network still be approximately maintained? We show that in any arbitrary Gaussian network with bidirected edges and cycles and unicast traffic, we can always identify a directed acyclic subnetwork that approximately maintains the capacity of the original network. For Gaussian networks with multiple-access and broadcast traffic, an acyclic subnetwork is sufficient to achieve every rate point in the capacity region of the original network, however, there may not be a single acyclic subnetwork that maintains the whole capacity region. For networks with multicast and multiple unicast traffic, on the other hand, bidirected information flow across certain links can be critically needed to maximize the end-to-end capacity region. These results can be regarded as generalizations of the conclusions regarding the usefulness of feedback in various single-hop Gaussian settings and can provide opportunities for simplifying operation in Gaussian multi-hop networks.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.