Paper detail

On feasibility, stability and performance in distributed model predictive control

In distributed model predictive control (DMPC), where a centralized optimization problem is solved in distributed fashion using dual decomposition, it is important to keep the number of iterations in the solution algorithm, i.e. the amount of communication between subsystems, as small as possible. At the same time, the number of iterations must be enough to give a feasible solution to the optimization problem and to guarantee stability of the closed loop system. In this paper, a stopping condition to the distributed optimization algorithm that guarantees these properties, is presented. The stopping condition is based on two theoretical contributions. First, since the optimization problem is solved using dual decomposition, standard techniques to prove stability in model predictive control (MPC), i.e. with a terminal cost and a terminal constraint set that involve all state variables, do not apply. For the case without a terminal cost or a terminal constraint set, we present a new method to quantify the control horizon needed to ensure stability and a prespecified performance. Second, the stopping condition is based on a novel adaptive constraint tightening approach. Using this adaptive constraint tightening approach, we guarantee that a primal feasible solution to the optimization problem is found and that closed loop stability and performance is obtained. Numerical examples show that the number of iterations needed to guarantee feasibility of the optimization problem, stability and a prespecified performance of the closed-loop system can be reduced significantly using the proposed stopping condition.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.