Paper detail

On Fast Retrial for Two-Step Random Access in MTC

In machine-type communication (MTC), a group of devices or sensors may need to send their data packets with certain access delay limits for delay-sensitive applications or real-time Internet-of-Things (IoT) applications. In this case, 2-step random access approaches would be preferable to 4-step random access approaches that are employed for most MTC standards in cellular systems. While 2-step approaches are efficient in terms of access delay, their access delay is still dependent on retransmission strategies. Thus, for a low access delay, fast retrial that allows immediate re-transmissions can be employed as a re-transmission strategy. In this paper, we study 2-step random access approaches with fast retrial as a buffered multichannel ALOHA with fast retrial, and derive an analytical way to obtain the quality-of-service (QoS) exponent for the distribution of queue length so that key parameters can be decided to meet QoS requirements in terms of access delay. Simulation results confirm that the derived analytical approach can provide a good approximation of QoS exponent.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.