Paper detail

On Factors with Prescribed Degrees in Bipartite Graphs

We establish a new criterion for a bigraph to have a subgraph with prescribed degree conditions. We show that the bigraph $G[X,Y]$ has a spanning subgraph $F$ such that $g(x)\leq deg_F(x) \leq f(x)$ for $x\in X$ and $deg_F(y) \leq f(y)$ for $y\in Y$ if and only if $\sum\nolimits_{b\in B} f(b)\geq \sum\nolimits_{a\in A} \max \big\{0, g(a) - deg_{G-B}(a)\big\}$ for $A\subseteq X, B\subseteq Y$. Using Folkman-Fulkerson's Theorem, Cymer and Kano found a different criterion for the existence of such a subgraph (Graphs Combin. 32 (2016), 2315--2322). Our proof is self-contained and relies on alternating path technique. As an application, we prove the following extension of Hall's theorem. A bigraph $G[X,Y]$ in which each edge has multiplcity at least $m$ has a subgraph $F$ with $g(x)\leq deg_F(x)\leq f(x)\leq deg(x)$ for $x\in X$, $deg_F(y)\leq m$ for $y\in Y$ if and only if $\sum_{y\in N_G(S)}f(y)\geq \sum_{x\in S}g(x)$ for $S\subseteq X$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.