Paper detail

On emission-line spectra obtained from evolutionary synthesis models II. Scale-relations and the estimation of mass dependences

Aims. In this paper we study the influence of the ionizing cluster mass on the emission line spectrum of Hii regions in order to determine the influence of low mass clusters on the integrated emission line spectra of galaxies. Methods. For this purpose, we present a grid of photoionization models that covers metallicities from Z = 0.001 to Z = 0.040, ages from 0.1 to 10 Ma (with a time step of 0.1 Ma), and cluster initial masses from 1 to 107 Mo. The stellar masses follow a Salpeter initial mass function (IMF) in an instantaneous burst mode of star formation. We obtain power-law scale-relations between emission-line luminosities and ionizing cluster masses from the grids and we evaluate the dependences on the ionizing cluster mass for some line luminosities, equivalent widths and line ratios. Results. Power-law scale-relations are shown to be useful tools to obtain robust diagnostics, as examples: (a) H?/H? ratio varies from the usually assumed value of 2.86, these variations imply the existence of a lower limit to the attainable precision in extinction estimations of ?E(B - V) ~ 0.1.; (b) EW(H?) is a good age indicator with a small dependence on cluster mass, while EW([O iii] 5007) shows a noteworthy mass dependence; (c) abundance estimations from R23 are practically unaffected by variations of the cluster mass; (d) estimations from S 23 and ?&#39; would improve if the cluster mass dependences were considered and (e) [Oii] 3727/H? is a good star formation rate indicator for ages older than -4.5 Ma. We also show that the ionizing cluster mass dependence explains why empirical calibrations produce more reliable diagnostics of some emission lines than photoionization models grids. Finally, we show preliminary results about the contribution of low mass clusters (M < 104 Mo) to the integrated emission line spectra of galaxies, which can be as high as 80% for some relevant lines.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.