Paper detail

On electrostatic screening of ions in astrophysical plasmas

There has been some controversy over the expression for the so-called `interaction energy' due to screening of charged particles in a plasma. Even in the relatively simple case of weak screening, first discussed in the context of astrophysical plasmas by Salpeter (1954), there is disagreement. In particular, Shaviv and Shaviv (1996) have claimed recently that by not considering explicitly in his calculation the complete screening cloud, Salpeter obtained a result for the interaction energy between two nuclei separated by a distance $r$ which in the limit $r \to 0$ is only 2/3 the correct value. It appears that this claim has arisen from a fundamental misconception concerning the dynamics of the interaction. We rectify this misconception, and show that Salpeter's formula is indeed correct.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.