Paper detail

On Efficient Decoding and Design of Sparse Random Linear Network Codes

Random linear network coding (RLNC) in theory achieves the max-flow capacity of multicast networks, at the cost of high decoding complexity. To improve the performance-complexity tradeoff, we consider the design of sparse network codes. A generation-based strategy is employed in which source packets are grouped into overlapping subsets called generations. RLNC is performed only amongst packets belonging to the same generation throughout the network so that sparseness can be maintained. In this paper, generation-based network codes with low reception overheads and decoding costs are designed for transmitting of the order of $10^2$-$10^3$ source packets. A low-complexity overhead-optimized decoder is proposed that exploits "overlaps" between generations. The sparseness of the codes is exploited through local processing and multiple rounds of pivoting of the decoding matrix. To demonstrate the efficacy of our approach, codes comprising a binary precode, random overlapping generations, and binary RLNC are designed. The results show that our designs can achieve negligible code overheads at low decoding costs, and outperform existing network codes that use the generation based strategy.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.