Paper detail

On disjoint crossing families in geometric graphs

A geometric graph is a graph drawn in the plane with vertices represented by points and edges as straight-line segments. A geometric graph contains a (k,l)-crossing family if there is a pair of edge subsets E_1,E_2 such that |E_1| = k and |E_2| = l, the edges in E_1 are pairwise crossing, the edges in E_2 are pairwise crossing, and every edges in E_1 is disjoint to every edge in E_2. We conjecture that for any fixed k,l, every n-vertex geometric graph with no (k,l)-crossing family has at most c_{k,l}n edges, where c_{k,l} is a constant that depends only on k and l. In this note, we show that every n-vertex geometric graph with no (k,k)-crossing family has at most c_kn\log n edges, where c_k is a constant that depends only on k, by proving a more general result which relates extremal function of a geometric graph F with extremal function of two completely disjoint copies of F. We also settle the conjecture for geometric graphs with no (2,1)-crossing family. As a direct application, this implies that for any circle graph F on 3 vertices, every n-vertex geometric graph that does not contain a matching whose intersection graph is F has at most O(n) edges.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.