Paper detail

On discrete values of bilinear forms

This paper is an erratum to our paper, entitled "On an application of Guth-Katz theorem", Math. Res. Lett. 18 (2011), no. 4, 691-697. Let $F$ be the real or complex field and $ω$ a non-degenerate skew-symmetric bilinear form in the plane $F^2$. We prove that for finite a point set $P\subset F^2\setminus\{0\}$, the set $T_ω(P)$ of nonzero values of $ω$ in $P\times P$, if nonempty, has cardinality $Ω(N^{9/13}).$ A presumably near-sharp estimate $Ω(N/\log N)$ was claimed in the abovemnetioned paper over the reals for a symmetric or skew-symmetric form $ω$. However, the set-up for the proof was flawed. We discuss why we believe that justifying this claim in full strength is a major open problem. In the special case when $P=A\times A$, where $A$ is a set of at least two reals, we establish the following sum-product type estimates: $$ |AA+ AA|= Ω\left(|A|^{19/12}\right), $$ and $$|AA-AA|= Ω\left( \frac{|A|^{26/17}}{\log^{2/17}|A|}\right).$$

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.