Paper detail

On density of horospheres in dynamical laminations

In 1985 D.Sullivan had introduced a dictionary between two domains of complex dynamics: iterations of rational functions on the Riemann sphere and Kleinian groups. The latters are discrete subgroups of the group of conformal automorphisms of the Riemann sphere. This dictionary motivated many remarkable results in both domains, starting from the famous Sullivan's no wandering domain theorem in the theory of iterations of rational functions. One of the principal objects used in the study of Kleinian groups is the hyperbolic 3- manifold associated to a Kleinian group, which is the quotient of its lifted action to the hyperbolic 3- space. M.Lyubich and Y.Minsky have suggested to extend Sullivan's dictionary by providing an analogous construction for iterations of rational functions. Namely, they have constructed a lamination by three-dimensional manifolds equipped with a continuous family with hyperbolic metrics on them (may be with singularities). The action of the rational mapping on the sphere lifts naturally up to homeomorphic action on the hyperbolic lamination that is isometric along the leaves. The action on the hyperbolic lamination admits a well-defined quotient called {\it the quotient hyperbolic lamination}. We study the arrangement of the horospheres in the quotient hyperbolic lamination. The main result says that if a rational function does not belong to a small list of exceptions (powers, Chebyshev and Lattès), then there are many dense horospheres, i.e., the horospheric lamination is topologically-transitive. We show that for "many" rational functions (hyperbolic or critically-nonrecurrent nonparabolic) the quotient horospheric lamination is minimal: each horosphere is dense.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.