Paper detail

On Delaunay Triangulations of Gromov Sets

Let $Y$ be a subset of a metric space $X.$ We say that $Y$ is $η$-Gromov provided $Y$ is $η$-separated and not properly contained in any other $η$-separated subset of $X.$ In this paper, we review a result of Chew which says that any $η$-Gromov subset of $\mathbb{R}^{2} $ admits a triangulation $\mathcal{T}$ whose smallest angle is at least $π/6 $ and whose edges have length between $η$ and $2η.$ We then show that given any $k = 1,2,3\ldots$, there is a subdivision $\mathcal{T} _{k}$ of $\mathcal{T}$ whose edges have length in $\left[ \fracη{10 k},\frac{2η}{10 k} \right] $ and whose minimum angle is also $π/6$. These results are used in the proof of the following theorem in [10]: For any $k\in R,v>0,$ and $D>0,$ the class of closed Riemannian $4$-manifolds with sectional curvature $\geq k,$ volume $\geq v,$ and diameter $\leq D$ contains at most finitely many diffeomorphism types. Additionally, these results imply that for any $\varepsilon >0$, if $η>0$ is sufficiently small, any $η$-Gromov subset of a compact Riemannian $2$-manifold admits a geodesic triangulation $\mathcal{T}$ for which all side lengths are in $\left[ η\left( 1-\varepsilon \right) ,2η\left( 1+\varepsilon \right) \right] $ and all angles are $\geq \frac{π}{6}-\varepsilon .$

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.