Paper detail

On Decoding Using Codewords of the Dual Code

We present novel decoding schemes for hard and soft decision decoding of block codes using the minimal weight codewords of the dual code. The decoding schemes will be described for cyclic codes where polynomials can be used, however, the modification for non-cyclic codes is possible and straight forward. The hard decision decoding calculates syndrome polynomials which are the product of the received polynomial with dual codewords. Proper cyclic shifts of these syndrome polynomials are obtained and the non-zero positions are counted componentwise for these shifts. The values of this counting are a reliability measure and can be used for locating the error and also the non-error positions. This reliability measure is the basis for various variants of hard decision decoding algorithms. Decoding schemes with iterative error reduction are possible as well as information set decoding using the inherent reliability information of the measure even if there is no reliability information from the channel. Further, we will show how reliability information from the channel can be included in order to obtain soft decision decoding schemes. We derive the relation between bit flipping, believe propagation, and majority logic decoding to the novel schemes. As examples to illustrate the functioning we use BCH and Reed-Muller codes as examples for binary codes, and RS codes for non-binary codes. Besides the Plotkin construction we recall a known result that Reed-Muller codes punctured by one position are cyclic and thus, are equivalent to special cases of BCH codes. Simulation results for hard and soft decision decoding will be given for several examples and compared with results from literature. Finally, we analyze the soft decision decoding of the Plotkin construction and derive that one of the two codes uses a $3$ dB better channel (also known as channel polarization).

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.