Paper detail

On dark stars, Planck cores and the nature of dark matter

Dark stars are compact massive objects, described by Einstein gravitational field equations with matter. The type we consider possesses no event horizon, instead, there is a deep gravitational well with a very strong redshift factor. Observationally, dark stars can be identified with black holes. Inside dark stars, Planck density of matter is reached, Planck cores are formed, where the equations are modified by quantum gravity. In the paper, several models of dark stars with Planck cores are considered, resulting in the following hypothesis on the composition of dark matter. The galaxies are flooded with low-energetic radiation from the dark stars. The particle type can be photons and gravitons from the Standard Model, can also be a new type of massless particles. The model estimations show that the extremely large redshift factor $z\sim10^{49}$ and the emission wavelength $λ_0\sim10^{14}$m can be reached. The particles are not registered directly in the existing dark matter experiments. They come in a density sufficient to explain the observable rotation curves. The emission has a geometric dependence of density on radius $ρ\sim r^{-2}$, producing flat rotation curves. The distribution of sources also describes the deviations from the flat shape. The model provides a good fit of experimental rotation curves. Outbreaks caused by a fall of an external object on a dark star lead to emission wavelength shifted towards smaller values. The model estimations give the outbreak wavelength $λ\sim1$m compatible with fast radio bursts. The paper raises several principal questions. White holes with Planck core appear to be stable. Galactic rotation curves in the considered setup do not depend on the matter type. Inside the galaxy, dark matter can be of hot radial type. At cosmological distances, it can behave like the cold uniform type.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.