Paper detail

On $D\to X_u l^+ l^-$ within the Standard Model and Frameworks like the Littlest Higgs Model with T Parity

The $D\to X_u l^+ l^-$ transitions -- branching ratios, forward-backward asymmetry $A^c_{FB}$, the CP asymmetry $A^c_{CP}$ and the CP asymmetry in the forward-backward asymmetry $A^{CP}_{FB}$ -- have two sources: for $D^{\pm}$ they represent a pure $ΔC=1$ & $ΔQ=0$ current interaction whereas neutral $D$ mesons can also communicate via their anti-hadron. Standard Model (SM) contributions to BR$(D\to X_u l^+ l^-)$ come primarily from long distance dynamics, which overshadow short distance contributions by several orders of magnitude; still they fall much below the present upper experimental bounds. Even the SM contributions to $A^c_{FB}$, $A^c_{CP}$ and $A^{CP}_{FB}$ are tiny, quite unlike in beauty hadrons. The branching ratios are hardly dented by contributions from the Littlest Higgs Models with T parity (LHT) even in the short distance regime, let alone in the SM long distances dynamics. Yet the asymmetries $A^c_{FB}$, $A^c_{CP}$ and $A^{CP}_{FB}$ in these New Physics models can be enhanced over SM predictions, as they arise purely from short distance dynamics; this can occur in particular for $A^c_{FB}$ and $A^{CP}_{FB}$ which get enhanced by orders of magnitudes. Even such enhancements hardly reach absolute sizes for observable experimental effects for $A^c_{FB}$ and $A^c_{CP}$. However LHT contributions to $A^{CP}_{FB}$ could be measured in experiments like the LHCb and the SuperB Collaboration. These results lead us to draw further conclusions on FCNCs within LHT-like models through some simple scaling arguments that encapsulate the essence of flavour dynamics in and beyond the Standard Model.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.