Paper detail

On d+id density wave and superconducting orderings in hole-doped cuprates

The Chiral d-density wave (CDDW) order, at the anti-ferromagnetic wave vector (pi,pi), is assumed to represent the pseudo-gap (PG) state of a hole-doped cuprate superconductor. The pairing interaction required for the PG phase corresponds to a repulsive interaction of Coulombic origin. The d-wave superconductivity (DSC), driven by an appropriate assumed attractive interaction, is discussed within the mean-field framework together with the CDDW ordering. The single-particle excitation spectrum in the CDDW and DSC state is characterized by the Bogolubov quasi-particle bands-a characteristic feature of SC state. The coupled gap equations are solved self-consistently together with the equation to determine the chemical potential. With the pinning of the van Hove-singularities close to the chemical potential, one is able to calculate the thermodynamic and transport properties of the under-doped cuprates in a consistent manner. The electronic specific heat displays non-Fermi liquid feature in the CDDW state. The CDDW and DSC are found to represent two competing orders as the former brings about a depletion of the spectral weight (and Raman response function density) available for pairing in the anti-nodal region of momentum space.This is not in agreement with a preformed pairing scenario and justifies the different structures we have assumed for the pseudo-gap and the superconducting gap. Furthermore, these gaps in the excitation spectrum do not merge into a single quadrature gap. It is also shown that the depletion of the spectral weight below Tc at energies larger than the gap amplitude occurs. This is an indication of the strong-coupling superconductivity in cuprates. The calculation of the ratio of the quasi-particle thermal conductivity and temperature in the superconductiong phase is found to be constant in the limit of near-zero quasi-particle scattering rate.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.