Paper detail

On Cyclic Polar Codes and The Burst Erasure Performance of Spatially-Coupled LDPC Codes

Polar codes were introduced in 2009 and proven to achieve the symmetric capacity of any binary-input discrete memoryless channel under low-complexity successive cancellation decoding. In this thesis, we construct cyclic polar codes based on a mixed-radix Cooley-Tukey decomposition of the Galois field Fourier transform. The main results are: we can, for the first time, construct, encode and decode polar codes that are cyclic, with their blocklength being arbitrary; for a given target block erasure rate, we can achieve significantly higher code rates on the erasure channel than the original polar codes, at comparable blocklengths; on the symmetric channel with only errors, we can perform much better than equivalent rate Reed-Solomon codes with the same blocklength, by using soft-decision decoding; and, since the codes are subcodes of higher rate RS codes, a RS decoder can be used if suboptimal performance suffices for the application as a trade-off for higher decoding speed. In 2010, it was shown that spatially-coupled low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes approach the capacity of binary memoryless channels, asymptotically, with belief-propagation (BP) decoding. In this thesis, we are interested in the finite length average performance of randomly coupled LDPC ensembles on binary erasure channels with memory. The significant contributions of this work are: tight lower bounds for the block erasure probability ($P_B$) under various scenarios for the burst pattern; bounds focused on practical scenarios where a burst affects exactly one of the coupled codes; expected error floor for the bit erasure probability ($P_b$) on the binary erasure channel; and, characterization of the performance of random regular ensembles, on erasure channels, with a single vector describing distinct types of size-$2$ stopping sets. All these results are verified using Monte-Carlo simulations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.