Paper detail

On correcting the eddy-viscosity models in RANS simulations for turbulent flows and scalar transport around obstacles

In RANS simulations for turbulent scalar transport, it is common that using an eddy-viscosity (EV) model to close the Reynolds stress yields reasonable mean flow predictions but large errors in scalar transfer results regardless of scalar flux model inadequacies. This failure mode of EV models is generally related to the fact that the transport of momentum and scalar depends on different Reynolds stress components. The present work addresses two common issues relevant to such failures in turbulent scalar transport around obstacles. The first issue is the general overprediction of scalar transfer near the upwind surfaces, which is primarily attributed to the absence of wall-blocking mechanism in conventional EV models. We accordingly propose a Shear-Preserving-Wall-Blocking (SPWB) method to analytically correct the overpredicted wall-normal stress under the realizability constraint. The second issue is the general underprediction of scalar transfer in the downstream large separation regions, which is essentially attributed to the presence of vortex shedding invalidating the scaling ground in conventional EV models' dissipation closures. We accordingly apply the recently proposed Double-Scale Double-Linear-EV (DSDL) model to scalar transport predictions. Consequently, a hybrid model SPWB-DSDL is developed. The model is then applied to two test cases, of which the first features a bluff obstacle with an upstream impingement flow and a downstream two-dimensional separation and the second a streamlined obstacle with an upstream concave surface flow and a downstream three-dimensional separation. In the two cases, the SPWB-DSDL model is capable of simultaneously yielding reasonable results of mean flow field, turbulence energy and stress, and scalar transfer in both upstream and downstream regions, thus demonstrating significant improvement upon a classical EV model.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.