Paper detail

On constant-multiple-free sets contained in a random set of integers

For a rational number $r>1$, a set $A$ of positive integers is called an $r$-multiple-free set if $A$ does not contain any solution of the equation $rx = y$. The extremal problem on estimating the maximum possible size of $r$-multiple-free sets contained in $[n]:={1,2,...,n}$ has been studied for its own interest in combinatorial number theory and application to coding theory. Let $a$, $b$ be positive integers such that $a<b$ and the greatest common divisor of $a$ and $b$ is 1. Wakeham and Wood showed that the maximum size of $(b/a)$-multiple-free sets contained in $[n]$ is $\frac{b}{b+1}n+O(\log n)$. In this paper we generalize this result as follows. For a real number $p\in (0,1)$, let $[n]_p$ be a set of integers obtained by choosing each element $i\in [n]$ randomly and independently with probability $p$. We show that the maximum possible size of $(b/a)$-multiple-free sets contained in $[n]_p$ is $\frac{b}{b+p}pn+O(\sqrt{pn}\log n \log \log n)$ with probability that goes to 1 as $n\to \infty$.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.