Paper detail

On Constant Distance Spacing Policies for Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control

Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) systems are considered as key potential enablers to improve driving safety and traffic efficiency. They allow for automated vehicle following using wireless communication in addition to onboard sensors. To achieve string stability in CACC platoons, constant time headway (CTH) spacing policies have prevailed in research; namely, vehicle interspacing grows with the speed. While constant distance headway (CDH) spacing policies provide superior potential to increase traffic capacity than CTH, a major drawback is a smaller safety margin at high velocities and string stability cannot be achieved using a one-vehicle look-ahead communication. The hypothesis of this work is to apply CDH only in few driving situations, when traffic throughput is of highest importance and safety requirements can be met due to comparably low velocities. As the most relevant situations where CDH could be applied, we identify starting platoons at signalized intersections. In this paper, we illustrate this idea. Specifically, we compare CTH with CDH regarding its potential to increase the capacity of traffic lights. Starting with the elementary situation of single traffic lights we expand our scope to whole traffic networks including several thousand vehicles in simulation. Using real world data to calibrate and validate vehicle dynamics simulation and traffic simulation, the study discusses the most relevant working parameters of CDH, CTH, and the traffic system in which both are applied.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.