Paper detail

On Computing the $k$-Shortcut Fréchet Distance

The Fréchet distance is a popular measure of dissimilarity for polygonal curves. It is defined as a min-max formulation that considers all direction-preserving continuous bijections of the two curves. Because of its susceptibility to noise, Driemel and Har-Peled introduced the shortcut Fréchet distance in 2012, where one is allowed to take shortcuts along one of the curves, similar to the edit distance for sequences. We analyse the parameterized version of this problem, where the number of shortcuts is bounded by a parameter $k$. The corresponding decision problem can be stated as follows: Given two polygonal curves $T$ and $B$ of at most $n$ vertices, a parameter $k$ and a distance threshold $δ$, is it possible to introduce $k$ shortcuts along $B$ such that the Fréchet distance of the resulting curve and the curve $T$ is at most $δ$? We study this problem for polygonal curves in the plane. We provide a complexity analysis for this problem with the following results: (i) assuming the exponential-time-hypothesis (ETH), there exists no algorithm with running time bounded by $n^{o(k)}$; (ii) there exists a decision algorithm with running time in $O(kn^{2k+2}\log n)$. In contrast, we also show that efficient approximate decider algorithms are possible, even when $k$ is large. We present a $(3+\varepsilon)$-approximate decider algorithm with running time in $O(k n^2 \log^2 n)$ for fixed $\varepsilon$. In addition, we can show that, if $k$ is a constant and the two curves are $c$-packed for some constant $c$, then the approximate decider algorithm runs in near-linear time.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.