Paper detail

On Compress-Forward without Wyner-Ziv Binning for Relay Networks

Noisy network coding is recently proposed for the general multi-source network by Lim, Kim, El Gamal and Chung. This scheme builds on compress-forward (CF) relaying but involves three new ideas, namely no Wyner-Ziv binning, relaxed simultaneous decoding and message repetition. In this paper, using the two-way relay channel as the underlining example, we analyze the impact of each of these ideas on the achievable rate region of relay networks. First, CF without binning but with joint decoding of both the message and compression index can achieve a larger rate region than the original CF scheme for multi-destination relay networks. With binning and successive decoding, the compression rate at each relay is constrained by the weakest link from the relay to a destination; but without binning, this constraint is relaxed. Second, simultaneous decoding of all messages over all blocks without uniquely decoding the compression indices can remove the constraints on compression rate completely, but is still subject to the message block boundary effect. Third, message repetition is necessary to overcome this boundary effect and achieve the noisy network coding region for multi-source networks. The rate region is enlarged with increasing repetition times. We also apply CF without binning specifically to the one-way and two-way relay channels and analyze the rate regions in detail. For the one-way relay channel, it achieves the same rate as the original CF and noisy network coding but has only 1 block decoding delay. For the two-way relay channel, we derive the explicit channel conditions in the Gaussian and fading cases for CF without binning to achieve the same rate region or sum rate as noisy network coding. These analyses may be appealing to practical implementation because of the shorter encoding and decoding delay in CF without binning.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.