Paper detail

On Compositional Reasoning for Guaranteeing Probabilistic Properties

We present a framework to formally describe probabilistic system behavior and symbolically reason about it. In particular we aim at reasoning about possible failures and fault tolerance. We regard systems which are composed of different units: sensors, computational parts and actuators. Considering worst-case failure behavior of system components, our framework is most suited to derive reliability guarantees for composed systems. The behavior of system components is modeled using monad like constructs that serve as an abstract representation for system behavior. We introduce rules to reason about these representations and derive results like guaranteed upper bounds for system failure. Our approach is characterized by the fact that we do not just map a certain component to a failure probability, but regard distributions of error behavior and their evolvement over system runs. This serves as basis for deriving probabilities of events, in particular failure probabilities. The work presented in this paper slightly extends a complete framework and a case study which has been previously published. One focus of this report is a more detailed explanation of definitions and a more comprehensive description of examples.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.