Paper detail

On complexity of substructure connectivity and restricted connectivity of graphs

The connectivity of a graph is an important parameter to evaluate its reliability. $k$-restricted connectivity (resp. $R^h$-restricted connectivity) of a graph $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set $S$ of vertices in $G$, if exists, whose deletion disconnects $G$ and leaves each component of $G-S$ with more than $k$ vertices (resp. $δ(G-S)\geq h$). In contrast, structure (substructure) connectivity of $G$ is defined as the minimum number of vertex-disjoint subgraphs whose deletion disconnects $G$. As generalizations of the concept of connectivity, structure (substructure) connectivity, restricted connectivity and $R^h$-restricted connectivity have been extensively studied from the combinatorial point of view. Very little is known about the computational complexity of these variants, except for the recently established NP-completeness of $k$-restricted edge-connectivity. In this paper, we prove that the problems of determining structure, substructure, restricted, and $R^h$-restricted connectivity are all NP-complete.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.