Paper detail

On complete and incomplete exponential systems

Given a bounded domain $Ω\subset {\Bbb R}^d$ with positive measure and a finite set $A=\{a^1, a^2, \dots, a^d\}$, we say that the set ${\mathcal E}(A)={\{e^{2 πi x \cdot a^j}\}}_{a^j \in A}$ is a complete exponential system if for every $ξ\in {\Bbb R}^d$, there exists $1 \leq j \leq d+1$ such that \begin{equation} \label{completedef} \int_Ω e^{-2 πi x \cdot (a^j-ξ)} dx \not=0; \end{equation} otherwise ${\mathcal E}(A)$ is called an incomplete exponential system. In this paper, we essentially classify complete and incomplete exponential systems when $Ω=B_d$, the unit ball, and when $Ω=Q_d$, the unit cube. Given a bounded domain $Ω$, we say that $e^{2 πi x \cdot a}, e^{2 πi x \cdot a'}$ are $ϕ$-approximately orthogonal if $$|\widehatχ_Ω(a-a')| \leq ϕ(|a-a'|), \ a\neq a'$$ where $ϕ: [0, \infty) \to [0, \infty)$ is a bounded measurable function that tends to $0$ at infinity. We prove that $L^2(B_d)$ does not possess a $ϕ$-approximate orthogonal basis of exponentials for a wide range of functions $ϕ$. The proof involves connections with the theory of distances in sets of positive Lebesgue upper density originally developed by Furstenberg, Katznelson and Weiss (\cite{FKW90}).

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.