Paper detail

On comparing Zagreb indices

Let $G=(V,E)$ be a simple graph with $n = |V|$ vertices and $m = |E|$ edges. The first and second Zagreb indices are among the oldest and the most famous topological indices, defined as $M_1 = \sum_{i \in V} d_i^2$ and $M_2 = \sum_{(i, j) \in E} d_i d_j$, where $d_i$ denote the degree of vertex $i$. Recently proposed conjecture $M_1 / n \leqslant M_2 / m$ has been proven to hold for trees, unicyclic graphs and chemical graphs, while counterexamples were found for both connected and disconnected graphs. Our goal is twofold, both in favor of a conjecture and against it. Firstly, we show that the expressions $M_1/n$ and $M_2/m$ have the same lower and upper bounds, which attain equality for and only for regular graphs. We also establish sharp lower bound for variable first and second Zagreb indices. Secondly, we show that for any fixed number $k\geqslant 2$, there exists a connected graph with $k$ cycles for which $M_1/n>M_2/m$ holds, effectively showing that the conjecture cannot hold unless there exists some kind of limitation on the number of cycles or the maximum vertex degree in a graph. In particular, we show that the conjecture holds for subdivision graphs.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.