Paper detail

On Communication Complexity of Fixed Point Computation

Brouwer's fixed point theorem states that any continuous function from a compact convex space to itself has a fixed point. Roughgarden and Weinstein (FOCS 2016) initiated the study of fixed point computation in the two-player communication model, where each player gets a function from $[0,1]^n$ to $[0,1]^n$, and their goal is to find an approximate fixed point of the composition of the two functions. They left it as an open question to show a lower bound of $2^{Ω(n)}$ for the (randomized) communication complexity of this problem, in the range of parameters which make it a total search problem. We answer this question affirmatively. Additionally, we introduce two natural fixed point problems in the two-player communication model. $\bullet$ Each player is given a function from $[0,1]^n$ to $[0,1]^{n/2}$, and their goal is to find an approximate fixed point of the concatenation of the functions. $\bullet$ Each player is given a function from $[0,1]^n$ to $[0,1]^{n}$, and their goal is to find an approximate fixed point of the interpolation of the functions. We show a randomized communication complexity lower bound of $2^{Ω(n)}$ for these problems (for some constant approximation factor). Finally, we initiate the study of finding a panchromatic simplex in a Sperner-coloring of a triangulation (guaranteed by Sperner's lemma) in the two-player communication model: A triangulation $T$ of the $d$-simplex is publicly known and one player is given a set $S_A\subset T$ and a coloring function from $S_A$ to $\{0,\ldots ,d/2\}$, and the other player is given a set $S_B\subset T$ and a coloring function from $S_B$ to $\{d/2+1,\ldots ,d\}$, such that $S_A\dot\cup S_B=T$, and their goal is to find a panchromatic simplex. We show a randomized communication complexity lower bound of $|T|^{Ω(1)}$ for the aforementioned problem as well (when $d$ is large).

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.