Paper detail

On clean, weakly clean, and feebly clean commutative group rings

A ring $R$ is said to be clean if each element of $R$ can be written as the sum of a unit and an idempotent. $R$ is said to be weakly clean if each element of $R$ is either a sum or a difference of a unit and an idempotent, and $R$ is said to be feebly clean if every element $r$ can be written as $r=u+e_1-e_2$, where $u$ is a unit and $e_1,e_2$ are orthogonal idempotents. Clearly clean rings are weakly clean rings and both of them are feebly clean. In a recent article (J. Algebra Appl. 17 (2018), 1850111(5 pages)), McGoven characterized when the group ring $\mathbb Z_{(p)}[C_q]$ is weakly clean and feebly clean, where $p, q$ are distinct primes. In this paper, we consider a more general setting. Let $K$ be an algebraic number field, $\mathcal O_K$ its ring of integers, $\mathfrak p\subset \mathcal O$ a nonzero prime ideal, and $\mathcal O_{\mathfrak p}$ the localization of $\mathcal O$ at $\mathfrak p$. We investigate when the group ring $\mathcal O_{\mathfrak p}[G]$ is weakly clean and feebly clean, where $G$ is a finite abelian group, and establish an explicit characterization for such a group ring to be weakly clean and feebly clean for the case when $K=\mathbb Q(ζ_n)$ is a cyclotomic field or $K=\mathbb Q(\sqrt{d})$ is a quadratic field.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.