Paper detail

On classifying decision making units in DEA: A unified dominance-based model

In data envelopment analysis (DEA), the concept of efficiency is examined in either Farrell (DEA) or Pareto senses. In either of these senses, the efficiency status of a decision making unit (DMU) is classified as either weak or strong. It is well established that the strong DEA efficiency is both necessary and sufficient for achieving the Pareto efficiency. For the weak Pareto efficiency, however, the weak DEA efficiency is only sufficient, but not necessary in general. Therefore, a DEA-inefficient DMU can be either weakly Pareto efficient or Pareto inefficient. Motivated by this fact, we propose a new classification of DMUs in terms of both DEA and Pareto efficiencies. To make this classification, we first demonstrate that the Farrell efficiency is based on the notion of FGL dominance. Based on the concept of dominance, we then propose and substantiate an alternative single-stage method. Our method is computationally efficient since (i) it involves solving a unique single-stage model for each DMU, and (ii) it accomplishes the classification of DMUs in both input and output orientations simultaneously. Finally, we present a numerical example to illustrate our proposed method.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.