Paper detail

On cascade of kinetic energy in compressible hydrodynamic turbulence

Properties of the turbulent cascade of kinetic energy are studied using direct numerical simulations of three-dimensional hydrodynamic decaying turbulence with a moderate Reynolds number and the initial Mach number $M=1$. Compressible and incompressible versions of the Karman-Howarth-Monin (KHM) and low-pass filtering/coarse-graining approaches are compared. In the simulation the total energy is well conserved; the scale dependent KHM and coarse-grained energy equations are also well conserved; the two approaches show similar results, the system does not have an inertial range for the cascade of kinetic energy, the region where this cascade dominates also have a non-negligible contribution of the kinetic-energy decay, dissipation, and pressure-dilatation effects. While the two approaches give semi-quantitatively similar results for the kinetic energy cascade, dissipation and pressure-dilatation rates, they differ in the increment separation and filtering scales; these scales are not simply related. The two approaches may be used to find the inertial range and to determine the cascade/dissipation rate of the kinetic energy.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.