Paper detail

On Capacity of the Dirty Paper Channel with Fading Dirt in the Strong Fading Regime

The classical writing on dirty paper capacity result establishes that full interference pre-cancellation can be attained in Gelfand-Pinsker problem with additive state and additive white Gaussian noise. This result holds under the idealized assumption that perfect channel knowledge is available at both transmitter and receiver. While channel knowledge at the receiver can be obtained through pilot tones, transmitter channel knowledge is harder to acquire. For this reason, we are interested in characterizing the capacity under the more realistic assumption that only partial channel knowledge is available at the transmitter. We study, more specifically, the dirty paper channel in which the interference sequence in multiplied by fading value unknown to the transmitter but known at the receiver. For this model, we establish an approximate characterization of capacity for the case in which fading values vary greatly in between channel realizations. In this regime, which we term the strong fading regime, the capacity pre-log factor is equal to the inverse of the number of possible fading realizations.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.