Paper detail

On Brownian Motion of Helium Ions in the Ballistic Regime

Discussed in the paper is the possibility of introducing the concept of Brownian motion of various mesoparticles in the ballistic regime. The case in point is the effect of collisions between thermal excitations in the liquid and the test mesoparticle (allowing to trace its position) on the thermal motion of the latter. The standard criterion for the brownian nature of the particle motion assumes that the inequality $l_s<R_i$ is satisfied and, consequently, a large number of collisions with the averaged response of the mesoparticle to such a bombardment (here $l_s$ is the mean free path of helium excitations, $R_i$ is the effective mesoparticle radius). However, the opposite limit $l_s>R_i$, which we refer to as the ballistic regime, is also possible. It is characterized with the specific features in the behavior of mesoparticles. The emphasis is made on the already available evidences indicating this behavior in the thermal motion of helium ions.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.