Paper detail

On bounding the difference between the maximum degree and the chromatic number by a constant

We provide a finite forbidden induced subgraph characterization for the graph class $\varUpsilon_k$, for all $k \in \mathbb{N}_0$, which is defined as follows. A graph is in $\varUpsilon_k$ if for any induced subgraph, $Δ\leq χ-1 + k$ holds, where $Δ$ is the maximum degree and $χ$ is the chromatic number of the subgraph. We compare these results with those given in [O. Schaudt, V. Weil, On bounding the difference between the maximum degree and the clique number, Graphs and Combinatorics 31(5), 1689-1702 (2015). DOI: 10.1007/s00373-014-1468-3], where we studied the graph class $\varOmega_k$, for $k \in \mathbb{N}_0$, whose graphs are such that for any induced subgraph, $Δ\leq ω-1 + k$ holds, where $ω$ denotes the clique number of a graph. In particular, we give a characterization in terms of $\varOmega_k$ and $\varUpsilon_k$ of those graphs where the neighborhood of every vertex is perfect.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.