Paper detail

On biharmonic submanifolds in non-positively curved manifolds

In the biharmonic submanifolds theory there is a generalized Chen's conjecture which states that biharmonic submanifolds in a Riemannian manifold with non-positive sectional curvature must be minimal. This conjecture turned out false by a counter example of Y. L. Ou and L. Tang in \cite{Ou-Ta}. However it remains interesting to find out sufficient conditions which guarantee this conjecture to be true. In this note we prove that: 1. Any complete biharmonic submanifold (resp. hypersurface) $(M, g)$ in a Riemannian manifold $(N, h)$ with non-positive sectional curvature (resp. Ricci curvature) which satisfies an integral condition: for some $p\in (0, +\infty)$, $\int_{M}|\vec{H}|^{p}du_g<+\infty,$ where $\vec{H}$ is the mean curvature vector field of $M\hookrightarrow N$, must be minimal. This generalizes the recent results due to N. Nakauchi and H. Urakawa in \cite{Na-Ur1} and \cite{Na-Ur2}. 2. Any complete biharmonic submanifold (resp. hypersurface) in a Reimannian manifold of at most polynomial volume growth whose sectional curvature (resp. Ricci curvature) is non-positive must be minimal. 3. Any complete biharmonic submanifold (resp. hypersurface) in a non-positively curved manifold whose sectional curvature (resp. Ricci curvature) is smaller that $-ε$ for some $ε>0$ which satisfies that $\int_{B_ρ(x_0)}|\vec{H}|^{p+2}dμ_g(p\geq0)$ is of at most polynomial growth of $ρ$, must be minimal. We also consider $\varepsilon$-superbiharmonic submanifolds defined recently in \cite{Wh} by G. Wheeler and prove similar results for $\varepsilon$-superbiharmonic submanifolds, which generalize the result in \cite{Wh}.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.