Paper detail

On asymptotic approximations to the log-Gamma and Riemann-Siegel theta functions

We give bounds on the error in the asymptotic approximation of the log-Gamma function $\lnΓ(z)$ for complex $z$ in the right half-plane. These improve on earlier bounds by Behnke and Sommer (1962), Spira (1971), and Hare (1997). We show that $|R_{k+1}(z)/T_k(z)| < \sqrt{πk}$ for nonzero $z$ in the right half-plane, where $T_k(z)$ is the $k$-th term in the asymptotic series, and $R_{k+1}(z)$ is the error incurred in truncating the series after $k$ terms. If $k \le |z|$, then the stronger bound $|R_{k+1}(z)/T_k(z)| < (k/|z|)^2/(π^2-1) < 0.113$ holds. Similarly for the asymptotic approximation of $\lnΓ(z+\frac{1}{2})$, except that a factor $η_k = 1/(1-2^{1-2k})$ multiplies some of the bounds. We deduce similar bounds for asymptotic approximation of the Riemann-Siegel theta function $\vartheta(t)$. We show that the accuracy of a well-known approximation to $\vartheta(t)$ can be improved by including an exponentially small term in the approximation. This improves the attainable accuracy for real $t>0$ from $O(\exp(-πt))$ to $O(\exp(-2πt))$. We discuss a similar example due to Olver (1964), and a connection with the Stokes phenomenon.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.