Paper detail

On Artifacts in Limited Data Spherical Radon Transform: Curved Observation Surface

In this article, we consider the limited data problem for spherical mean transform. We characterize the generation and strength of the artifacts in a reconstruction formula. In contrast to the third's author work [Ngu15b], the observation surface considered in this article is not flat. Our results are comparable to those obtained in [Ngu15b] for flat observation surface. For the two dimensional problem, we show that the artifacts are $k$ orders smoother than the original singularities, where $k$ is vanishing order of the smoothing function. Moreover, if the original singularity is conormal, then the artifacts are $k+\frac{1}{2}$ order smoother than the original singularity. We provide some numerical examples and discuss how the smoothing effects the artifacts visually. For three dimensional case, although the result is similar to that [Ngu15b], the proof is significantly different. We introduce a new idea of lifting the space.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.