Paper detail

On approximate data reduction for the Rural Postman Problem: Theory and experiments

Given an undirected graph with edge weights and a subset $R$ of its edges, the Rural Postman Problem (RPP) is to find a closed walk of minimum total weight containing all edges of $R$. We prove that RPP is WK[1]-complete parameterized by the number and cost $d$ of edges traversed additionally to the required ones. Thus, in particular, RPP instances cannot be polynomial-time compressed to instances of size polynomial in $d$ unless the polynomial-time hierarchy collapses. In contrast, denoting by $b\leq 2d$ the number of vertices incident to an odd number of edges of $R$ and by $c\leq d$ the number of connected components formed by the edges in $R$, we show how to reduce any RPP instance $I$ to an RPP instance $I'$ with $2b+O(c/\varepsilon)$ vertices in $O(n^3)$ time so that any $α$-approximate solution for $I'$ gives an $α(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate solution for $I$, for any $α\geq 1$ and $\varepsilon>0$. That is, we provide a polynomial-size approximate kernelization scheme (PSAKS). We experimentally evaluate it on wide-spread benchmark data sets as well as on two real snow plowing instances from Berlin. On instances with few connected components, the number of vertices and required edges is reduced to about $50\,\%$ at a $1\,\%$ solution quality loss. We also make first steps towards a PSAKS for the parameter $c$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.